tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-187739452024-03-18T20:53:48.949-07:00impeachment and other dreamsthe shitstorm after the golden daysdguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.comBlogger471125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-67117618618367528062016-11-10T07:16:00.002-08:002016-11-10T07:16:32.518-08:00Well, we're really screwed now...The results are in.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEinPzc6deUvfKcwhqXJ0aUO7foDc43mhD36hK7q7-K1N7OrYXcvXQmXkFH4lpg7_VSuEjkiuJIFSrQWAlPaD-yFVuo8zbQWWm1bpw9Wdbe4Hymspc5g-jAed_Ka-5kz8DhVzgov/s1600/ugh+1.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="199" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEinPzc6deUvfKcwhqXJ0aUO7foDc43mhD36hK7q7-K1N7OrYXcvXQmXkFH4lpg7_VSuEjkiuJIFSrQWAlPaD-yFVuo8zbQWWm1bpw9Wdbe4Hymspc5g-jAed_Ka-5kz8DhVzgov/s320/ugh+1.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Now we have four years of this:</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhpCyHt8_DaugY7MBUhOQTA6Y1VFSQTqdTL4jR24dcwPJn4ELsKk5ZFzcNPkGl74FyRGbANNBB-Q40g_DXKNv2ksjBXxyEAd9JPAS7sXEdMOeSHwzuXNxbtVB50CVbkzGS4tgs4/s1600/ugh+2.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhpCyHt8_DaugY7MBUhOQTA6Y1VFSQTqdTL4jR24dcwPJn4ELsKk5ZFzcNPkGl74FyRGbANNBB-Q40g_DXKNv2ksjBXxyEAd9JPAS7sXEdMOeSHwzuXNxbtVB50CVbkzGS4tgs4/s320/ugh+2.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
And in case you thought it'd be okay, that their policies will affect someone else:</div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJsDXUeFXRJjDHLiTW_2wgfJDbMMKF-3IfftC6t8xhvgiLNLZo-pAC5cJatcLg9rQMyENfcWLmdMRIGnMEPnCMoImZYKv8M-mV_9Kda1IfO1BDenMEerrEhyphenhyphenEm-dzmsyviR_WI/s1600/ugh+civil+liberties.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="208" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJsDXUeFXRJjDHLiTW_2wgfJDbMMKF-3IfftC6t8xhvgiLNLZo-pAC5cJatcLg9rQMyENfcWLmdMRIGnMEPnCMoImZYKv8M-mV_9Kda1IfO1BDenMEerrEhyphenhyphenEm-dzmsyviR_WI/s320/ugh+civil+liberties.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-66189498286460033892012-11-07T08:14:00.000-08:002012-11-07T08:17:23.452-08:00The Fall of Mittens<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEheGFJ80JFypAVzGGQ3lpFMBuu9YarKRf_3lEyndKfyJVJ2Jg5nnEn3Ls8jZzVi6-cHERzewrUpd7UvPAKAlyirpyzt4r2zy1UnNz4iVr9bUO0uYD-QgiojSrbx-OiOWuDEl7Pr/s1600/president-obama-and-first-lady-michelle-obama-dance-at-the-midwest-inaugural-ball-january-20-2009_i-G-35-3592-Y4U2F00Z.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEheGFJ80JFypAVzGGQ3lpFMBuu9YarKRf_3lEyndKfyJVJ2Jg5nnEn3Ls8jZzVi6-cHERzewrUpd7UvPAKAlyirpyzt4r2zy1UnNz4iVr9bUO0uYD-QgiojSrbx-OiOWuDEl7Pr/s400/president-obama-and-first-lady-michelle-obama-dance-at-the-midwest-inaugural-ball-january-20-2009_i-G-35-3592-Y4U2F00Z.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
Glad we'll be seeing more of this for the next four years, instead of this:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEivefIbv8Azr0hDDRMAALjXH2zTPeaBF5WAOoGcqe5IwHD4eBEsPFWhjtiVTucm2D0vVca-CIgu3C-IowWHc9yS-IrO1E_85HYbJukmWKzHfd7ooB_HAgiDTUejeWL-igUgcs5b/s1600/6264650_orig.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="204" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEivefIbv8Azr0hDDRMAALjXH2zTPeaBF5WAOoGcqe5IwHD4eBEsPFWhjtiVTucm2D0vVca-CIgu3C-IowWHc9yS-IrO1E_85HYbJukmWKzHfd7ooB_HAgiDTUejeWL-igUgcs5b/s320/6264650_orig.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
Four more years!dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-12745049569314710262012-09-05T16:25:00.002-07:002012-09-05T16:25:52.463-07:00Are you better off?Maybe these stupid say-nothing cowardly dems can't say it, but I can:<br />
<br />
YES. I am better off today than I was four years ago.<br />
<br />
--Four years ago, I was being denied a car loan, despite my high credit score, little knowing that within a few days the markets would crash and we'd teeter on the brink of another Great Depression.<br />
<br />
--Three years ago, I was trying to find a job in a California where unemployment was over 13 percent; I couldn't stay out there and had to move back from the land of dreams I always thought California would be.<br />
<br />
--Today, I'm working for a company that's hiring and that's paying people good wages and providing great benefits. I'm working hard, but I'm making more than I've ever made.<br />
<br />
--Today, I'm better off -- and feeling better now about life -- than I was back when we were all still reeling from eight years of Chimpy's dick-tater-shit.<br />
<br />
Things aren't perfect, but when I think about the possibility of seeing <i>Roe v. Wade</i> overturned, seeing my chances of marrying my partner disappear, and watching a new theocracy take over and likely follow Israel into war against Iran and anyone else brown and muslim, I know that even if I were swallowing sand in the desert and Romney offered me a glass of water (which would, given who he is, be a glass of piss), I'd STILL vote for Obama over Romney.<br />
<br />
What about you? dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-61270904499673722352012-09-04T19:54:00.002-07:002012-09-04T19:54:34.209-07:00Contrast: Michelle Obama vs Ann Romney<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQi7IpqTTe36MVcX2LztgWoxWsSY3i34rG32dnuypoQAms57ypHJdvDSm1-x-davp29R-FbepRATSmjfist0S9Y7ET1kZ1QEp4jj8ZDYVw6zGyLi6uzt8t279h5TsK9djozjtY/s1600/michelle_obama_dnc__2_082508.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQi7IpqTTe36MVcX2LztgWoxWsSY3i34rG32dnuypoQAms57ypHJdvDSm1-x-davp29R-FbepRATSmjfist0S9Y7ET1kZ1QEp4jj8ZDYVw6zGyLi6uzt8t279h5TsK9djozjtY/s1600/michelle_obama_dnc__2_082508.jpg" /></a></div>
No contest: Michelle actually sounds human and real. Like she's speaking off the top of her head. Unlike the creepy "I love you, women!" (shudder) train wreck of Ann Romney's robotic "humanizing" of her husband.dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-17455167481299023802012-09-04T19:14:00.003-07:002012-09-04T19:14:38.903-07:00Half-watching the DNCOne of the biggest differences I've noticed between the dems' convention and the repubs' convention is that the speakers tonight have been talking about President Obama, not themselves.<br />
<br />
One of the biggest differences between this year's dem convention and past ones is that these dems aren't afraid to say President Obama is pro-choice, pro-gay rights, pro-women, and pro-gressive. It's about time.<br />
<br />
No speeches to empty chairs by crazy old guys who used to be cool.<br />
<br />
No self-centered assholes spending three-quarters of their time talking about themselves. <br />
<br />
No strings of outright lies.<br />
<br />
I may not be an ardent Obama supporter, but I'd support just about ANY democrat over Romney and Ryan. I don't want drone wars, or any wars. But I REALLY don't want to see the end of reproductive rights, the continuation of the war-theocracy state that Bush II started, a renewed campaign of tax cuts for the super-wealthy, or an affirmation of the racist and classist hatred of the 99% that Romney/Ryan espouse. dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-79201202779563761362012-08-22T13:02:00.000-07:002012-08-22T13:02:09.297-07:00RIP Phyllis Diller<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZPZpdWnnI9OobTahC2QXx7vZaT4Se0xi0k4IXXqWKZU-N0d669iLJnSehZZmetTHeDdHofENvrEeoE3VZ2tOaxfw0Yw44V7cd29DUZFNXVUroeqQ4fIV9nVZmp7y-hj9ZEDC0/s1600/Phyllis-Diller-004.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="192" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZPZpdWnnI9OobTahC2QXx7vZaT4Se0xi0k4IXXqWKZU-N0d669iLJnSehZZmetTHeDdHofENvrEeoE3VZ2tOaxfw0Yw44V7cd29DUZFNXVUroeqQ4fIV9nVZmp7y-hj9ZEDC0/s320/Phyllis-Diller-004.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Rest in peace, Laugh-In lady. You were awesome.</div>
<br />dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-66656123489560584782012-08-14T16:07:00.000-07:002012-08-14T16:07:01.357-07:00Joke of the Year!<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjXj1flNSaK4_lKbfrdCfCbkGBMkqoiR2MTYAoOcdpZgMWaywm0Fa9n_Y4Z91i25Gm09T8sC8_wHP2P7dBXkTR3YPtFjmlAKy3MbD-0ucgNToFpuBl4pxou-Z8MzFyf1_ljRPLq/s1600/Goofballs+R+Us.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="208" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjXj1flNSaK4_lKbfrdCfCbkGBMkqoiR2MTYAoOcdpZgMWaywm0Fa9n_Y4Z91i25Gm09T8sC8_wHP2P7dBXkTR3YPtFjmlAKy3MbD-0ucgNToFpuBl4pxou-Z8MzFyf1_ljRPLq/s320/Goofballs+R+Us.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiymdTGGKiuQk-zS3VvwhDQ1sv1B9WzwHeFe__Gum5emdn2QuG4C0HzUUzRCXusgtzs05OKDq-ElTM7EGraOTMdrrlWdqMaDCO6R1KI4f7NH25oyCeWzIwD909XOxD28-hNufBP/s1600/220px-Paul_Ryan_official_portrait.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Goofy and Goofy-er 2012!</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-40317423382078656912012-07-19T18:29:00.000-07:002012-07-19T18:29:00.142-07:00New lowsIs there anything these crazy wingnuts won't do? No low they won't stoop to?<br />
<br />
Apparently not.<br />
<br />
First, Mittens has pretty much flat-out refused to release his tax returns, as is the custom when a person is running for public office. Whether or not he's done anything on them that will bite him in the ass is, to my mind, irrelevant. The plain truth is that the guy doesn't think he HAS to release them. He's arrogant enough to believe that he doesn't play by the same rules other people do, even those in that rarified air of presidential politics. But hey, I'm sure that arrogance will serve him well if he's elected (read: appointed) president and he's responsible for helping the 99% he claims so unconvincingly to give a shit about.<br />
<br />
Second, Crazy-eyes Jr. Michelle Bachmann (<a href="http://sparklepony.blogspot.com/2008/04/lolaura.html">Laura will always be Crazy-eyes Sr</a>.) has been channeling McCarthy and claiming <a href="http://seattletimes.com/html/editorials/2018728410_edit20bachmann.html">Huma Abedin is in bed with the Muslim Brotherhood</a> and is thus affecting US foreign policy for the terr-ists. Her bat-shit crazy accusations are completely unsubstantiated and will likely ruffle plenty of feathers in the Middle East as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton continues to push for <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-18866690">peace and democracy in Egypt and Israel</a>. I'm sure they're really jazzed about being accused of having a mole in the US government.<br />
<br />
Finally, the irrelevant Donald Trump is making a mountain of the molehill of President Obama's college transcripts, demanding the White House release said documents and that, if they don't, then it's obviously a cover-up. Why? To distract from the Romney tax returns, for one, and to highlight the fact that these repug jackasses obviously don't believe a black man could've done all that President Obama did -- graduated from Harvard with an MBA, been the head of the Harvard Law Review, etc. Typical racially motivated bullshit, meant to distract and discredit -- tactics they wouldn't employ against a white president, I'm sure. dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-65407105515623749572012-07-12T09:57:00.000-07:002012-07-12T09:57:25.095-07:00Let's go for 34!<a href="http://media.photobucket.com/image/head against wall/maynormatt/aFu_BangingYourHead1.gif?o=3" target="_blank"><img src="http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb1/maynormatt/aFu_BangingYourHead1.gif" border="0"></a>
As you probably already know, the repubs in the House of "Representatives" tried to repeal the Affordable Care Act AGAIN yesterday -- for the (depending on whom you believe; it varied by news source) perhaps 33rd time yesterday. They were, as they had been the last 30-odd times, unsuccessful, despite their blustering about how it's what Amurkans want, and how it's unconstitutional, and every other lie they could think of.<br />
<br />
They spent three hours "debating" (read: lying) about the ACA, but in the end they didn't get the votes. AGAIN. Again and again and again.<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, what else COULD they have done in those three hours?<br />
<br />
I heard someone on a lefty talkshow interviewing a senator from Vermont, where they're doing the ACA one better, going for single-payer at the state level and other such progressive (and smart) ideas. The interviewer asked about places like Texas, where pRick Erry is already saying Texas will opt out of the ACA. The interviewer added that it will likely cost Texas MORE to opt out than it will to just participate in the federal program. Such logic has never stopped Perry from making stupid-ass decisions before, though, so Texans will get screwed because they were naive and stupid enough to elect that moron. <br />
<br />
Then I started to think about all the old talk about "Texas Secede!" (that was a popular bumpersticker when I was a kid in Texas) and the times Perry has brought up secession. I wonder if it would ever really happen, and not just for Texas but for other states stuck with morons for governors. Think back to pre-Civil War America, with some states deciding they needed to break off from the union. Would that ever happen again?<br />
<br />
Imagine a U.S. divided into sane states and teabag states, where red states all join together, with liberty, insanity, and injustice for all those dirty illegals; and blue states could just join together and continue as the United States of America. And if I found myself living in a red teabag moron state, what would it take for me to move? (besides fear for my life)<br />
<br />
Could it happen? I almost wish it would, so the teabaggers would just get the hell out and stop fucking everything up. We'd elect <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0200276/">Jed Bartlett</a> president, and everything would be awesome.dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-4388538028750122492012-06-28T22:04:00.000-07:002012-06-28T22:04:00.910-07:00A win is a win - for nowSomehow, some way, President Obama got a huge win today when the Supremes upheld his health care act and the individual mandate, which survived as a "tax," per Chief Justice John Roberts. This language, of course, gave the republicans all the ammunition they needed to launch their renewed war against the law.<br />
<br />
Mere hours after the announcement, I heard a republican on Thom Hartmann's radio show (thank you, satellite radio!) state that they've already set a date -- July 11, he swore -- to repeal the law, "because that's what the American people want."<br />
<br />
Funny, the American people I know actually LIKE this health care law. My parents are thrilled that they're not having to pay through the nose for their prescriptions anymore. A friend told me she'd heard about all the new provisions for women's healthcare that will go into effect -- pregnancy will no longer be a pre-existing condition that insurance companies don't have to cover, and insurance companies will no longer be allowed to charge women and men different rates for the same coverage (hint: some of us -- the ones with vaginas -- were paying more for the exact same shit), among other changes. Another friend, who's never actually held a job that provided health benefits, was practically jumping for joy, thinking that maybe now she can finally afford to get regular health care.<br />
<br />
Yeah, Americans really hate it when we can go to the doctor when we're sick and not have to put up our left arms for collateral.<br />
<br />
Assuming the health care survives this threatened repeal vote, we'll also have to hope President Obama is reelected, as RobotMittens has threatened to repeal the law on his first day in office should he become president.<br />
<br />
Glad to know he's got his priorities straight -- that old job-creator. He's just so focused.dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-63565030068215325592012-06-27T21:16:00.003-07:002012-06-27T21:16:59.161-07:00Pick-a-mix: Repug VP candidate shuffle!<b style="font-weight: normal;">It's getting</b> close -- we'll be voting in the presidential election in less than six months! It's almost time for Mittens to make the biggest choice of his life: his veep! The guy who will run alongside him, serve as his attack dog, stand there and look interested during speeches, and pretty much do the dirty work.<br />
<br />
Let's scope out the contenders for our little Mittens:<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEididLcPbzF_kU-IdkMI-pLL6U5IqURIs76kZOY7DBtfrHejciv756eIqBSBB-ZbTM0yT7qI5i0oj8SfGO041GyQyBnbZT0VF3ygDpf6aNQliT-40IHv67ZCdtvK6LGwRUIoL2T/s1600/rubio.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEididLcPbzF_kU-IdkMI-pLL6U5IqURIs76kZOY7DBtfrHejciv756eIqBSBB-ZbTM0yT7qI5i0oj8SfGO041GyQyBnbZT0VF3ygDpf6aNQliT-40IHv67ZCdtvK6LGwRUIoL2T/s1600/rubio.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
1. The hispanic angle: <i> ¡Si Si Señor!</i> Pick Marco "but my feelings aren't hurt!"Rubio and dozens of clueless hispanic republicans (you'd have to be clueless to be hispanic and vote republican) will vote for you, Mitéo! Sure, <i>tiene sólo diez años</i>, but you could use a little youth on the ticket! And he's definitely a little youth! (Badabing! I'm here all week!)<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgBSoyt_5fBN95uA9OrTga6rUx4Vx-GySspq9xiCAlj5D_Sl8Ak7OdGgFumj1xajyb9uyp0vcoyonremAH7Sv06ikt3Zn76WBK9omE4wCY4qnwNKSxA0d3zQb3S3jacvSchXIFG/s1600/Tim_Pawlenty_official_photo.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgBSoyt_5fBN95uA9OrTga6rUx4Vx-GySspq9xiCAlj5D_Sl8Ak7OdGgFumj1xajyb9uyp0vcoyonremAH7Sv06ikt3Zn76WBK9omE4wCY4qnwNKSxA0d3zQb3S3jacvSchXIFG/s200/Tim_Pawlenty_official_photo.jpg" width="160" /></a></div>
2. Plenty of Pawlenty! Yes, Tim Pawlenty is actually still alive and some people think he could bring Mitt a vote or three. Admittedly, he's about as exciting as, well, cottage cheese, but when you're a robot, do you really want a flashy (read: human) running mate? Or do you just want someone who looks okay in a suit? Actually, now that I look at his official photo, I'm not that sure he isn't a robot too. It <i>does</i> compute!<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjpYVQe4-cjge-FcNgDzJsUqZjIxXkJuZsPIziTcrzkf-pUtCM7MHLh1i7y3_O-5EQXO9ErUyS8Kyljl4yF5xzjrsV3QqN_5LoAxjvSugBvpI6Dgt7YPJ5oslSXCaq9q2MJ0ea/s1600/portman.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="148" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjpYVQe4-cjge-FcNgDzJsUqZjIxXkJuZsPIziTcrzkf-pUtCM7MHLh1i7y3_O-5EQXO9ErUyS8Kyljl4yF5xzjrsV3QqN_5LoAxjvSugBvpI6Dgt7YPJ5oslSXCaq9q2MJ0ea/s200/portman.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<br />
3. Rob Portman -- um, isn't he the hitman Whitney Houston's sister hires in <a href="http://www.imdb.com/media/rm2955840768/nm0032962"><i>The Bodyguard</i></a>? Do you really want a felon as your running mate? If so, hell -- you might as well get the undead Dick Cheney and go all in, Mittens.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJRdNM4eUTcqKTk3QetQhyN8ps_b8InNyvoPW7m_MHtmW4_7-GJ-XChLPY6oWjxeJe7cOIIuct6ovIxy2s_Vzpi38xt6pUmZ9aEY2xkAzjlD6xmLNww2AVquPWM5sLXsDC5w5a/s1600/christie.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJRdNM4eUTcqKTk3QetQhyN8ps_b8InNyvoPW7m_MHtmW4_7-GJ-XChLPY6oWjxeJe7cOIIuct6ovIxy2s_Vzpi38xt6pUmZ9aEY2xkAzjlD6xmLNww2AVquPWM5sLXsDC5w5a/s200/christie.jpg" width="160" /></a></div>
<br />
4. Chris Christie: Full-on Buffet to the White House! This guy is the certainly the biggest candidate, but would he even help Mittens win New Jersey? He didn't even have the energy to run for president, despite the <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/chris-christie-not-running-for-president/">republican money machine begging him to</a>. <br />
<br />
Pluses and minuses on all these guys. What to do, what to do?<br />
<br />
I know: Let's look at some female potentials; after all, that really worked for Gramps McCain last time!<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMPeQBVlVWhLCM16_VPEOoM9bKt32SzFrPemNKEWChDxU170X3vqvGjhFGHF1DimsHqYeiZ-Yjchrt8-gDKRkUSI4cXeyomKwhd6gUrO9uJESk6sUXoS5-AYTy1Ikl3Lvp0S6Y/s1600/palin-winking.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMPeQBVlVWhLCM16_VPEOoM9bKt32SzFrPemNKEWChDxU170X3vqvGjhFGHF1DimsHqYeiZ-Yjchrt8-gDKRkUSI4cXeyomKwhd6gUrO9uJESk6sUXoS5-AYTy1Ikl3Lvp0S6Y/s200/palin-winking.jpg" width="176" /></a></div>
1. Going Rogue! Last time I checked, Sarah Palin hadn't been on TV for a
whole five minutes; she's obviously got nothing else going on. Besides,
it's not like she'd say no; once a media whore, always a media whore.
(I think Voltaire said that, no?)<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhmHPOO0oDVu2-vFPNjONFQFi64kN-NkSOLKM1yV73pVuEeIWy6Us_U0ZdovhCSEJYFtqT0gwuLgPF077OKjoytD3TXhS5ZUq7XbE7bQifGz-oj6y9piwRJ4XPreHh82SDk14Md/s1600/rice.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhmHPOO0oDVu2-vFPNjONFQFi64kN-NkSOLKM1yV73pVuEeIWy6Us_U0ZdovhCSEJYFtqT0gwuLgPF077OKjoytD3TXhS5ZUq7XbE7bQifGz-oj6y9piwRJ4XPreHh82SDk14Md/s200/rice.jpg" width="178" /></a></div>
2. No one could have predicted! A piano-playing, educated, experienced African-American woman on the ticket! Get outta here! No effing way! <br />
<br />
<i>No, seriously. No effing way. </i>This would never happen. <br />
<br />
Sad thing is, much as I can't stand Condi, she'd probably win him more votes than any of these other clowns. She actually has experience, credentials,a gravitas these other wannabes don't even know how to pretend to have.<br />
<br />
Which is one of the many reasons Mitt would never even think of her.dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-82054787689134616292012-05-29T19:07:00.002-07:002012-05-29T19:07:19.717-07:00in a nutshellWhenever I get annoyed with someone -- workmates, bosses, teachers, students, friends, whoever -- I play a little mental game with myself; I call it "in a nutshell." It's pretty much what it sounds like, the "in a nutshell" explanation that encapsulates something in a short phrase or sentence. In my case, I use a short phrase or sentence to encapsulate someone's personality or qualities.<br />
<br />
A simple example: I once had a boss who would tell me to do one thing and then, later, she'd ask me why the hell I'd done whatever it was she'd told me to. This happened on an almost daily basis. When I'd say, "I did it because you told me to," she would reply, "obviously, you misunderstood." So her "in a nutshell" was "Obviously, you misunderstood." That pretty much summed her stupid ass up. Oh, OBVIOUSLY it was my fault that despite my perfectly good ears, educated brain, and more than adequate qualifications for the job I was doing, I am the one who misunderstood her, rather than her forgetting what the hell she was talking about. I took to emailing her for instructions so that I could capture her shit in writing. She still claimed I misunderstood.<br />
<br />
So ... the game is simple, but it helps me keep my mouth closed when someone really pisses me off -- in work situations especially, when one must often keep one's mouth shut when one is confronted by a stupid boss or coworker, lest one get fired for screaming "ARE YOU A FUCKING IDIOT?" at them. In short, the game amuses me and makes it possible to go on living. I used to keep a little notebook of in-a-nutshells at my old job. I found the notebook the other night and was cackling for hours, to the confusion of AB.<br />
<br />
Anyway, I've recently added an entry for Mittens:<br />
"I need to get 50.1 percent or more."<br />
Pretty much sums up everything that's Mittens is about, doesn't it? He's not going to worry about what his supporters say or do; he's not going to worry about the facts or anything else. He could pretty much be saying his in-a-nutshell in response to any question, which is why it is so perfect. The guy has no moral center; there's no issue or past statement he won't completely kick to the curb if he thinks he'll get more votes for it.<br />
<br />
For example, let's just plug it into some imaginary but quite plausible media questions:<br />
<br />
Reporter: "Governor Romney, are you concerned about Iran's getting nuclear capability anytime soon?"<br />
Mittens: "I need to get 50.1 percent or more."<br />
Because what he'll do about defense or tensions in the Middle East are irrelevant to Mittens; he simply will do ANYTHING to get elected, and his statement pretty much proves it. If he'll go to bed with Trump -- a delusional reality-tv star and the symbol for everything that is wrong with real estate speculation and capitalism -- for a few bucks and some headlines, he'll go to bed with <i>anyone </i>for a few bucks and some headlines.<br />
<br />
Reporter: What's on the agenda today, sir? <br />
Mittens: "I need to get 50.1 percent or more."<br />
Because as I type this, Mittens is whoring himself to Trump and his fellow rich freaks in Vegas. Need I say more?<br />
<br />
Reporter: Governor, you've been known to <a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2012/may/18/politifacts-guide-mitt-romneys-flip-flops/">change positions on several important issues</a>: a woman's right to choose, gay marriage, government-run healthcare, even whether you're really a hunter. What are your true and heartfelt views on these issues?<br />
Mittens: "I need to get 50.1 percent or more."<br />
Again, it fits. The guy will say or do whatever he thinks he needs to in order to get elected. Has anyone ever wanted anything more? Like a kid who wants so badly to be popular in school that he'll buy other kids' lunches, do others' homework, or whatever. You know the type.<br />
<br />
What Mittens doesn't understand is that when you completely hollow yourself out in order to be everyman for everyone, you end up losing everything. Look at McCain. The guy used to have some principles; he used to be a true maverick. He finally sniffed the chance - the tiniest chance! - that he might be president, and he sold out on everything and everybody he every believed in. The guy let his handlers put Palin on the ticket with him, for god's sake. How low can anyone go?<br />
<br />
So Romney can claim all he wants about understanding everyday Americans, but one look at the people he's using to get votes -- Ted Nugent, Donald Trump, anyone on Faux Nooz -- tells you that this guy is about one thing: "I need to get 50.1 percent or more."<br />
<br />
Heaven help us if he does.dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-39902556023403480652012-04-26T17:54:00.000-07:002012-04-26T17:54:45.590-07:00Ready... Set... Snooze....So we're stuck with Mittens vs Obama.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxkjpqZyUW2fi2ukuu6aiMH8q22Dk8Z60i5sOreal4Pvfuw0s8rDnUg4GwnN7uLnaaJogEHI0hnIn9lsthvKE83VM7-9FDFUGEv3386kzD32CUXTSu_iTaC2GcJ9XjKlM0dseS/s1600/Untitled.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="316" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxkjpqZyUW2fi2ukuu6aiMH8q22Dk8Z60i5sOreal4Pvfuw0s8rDnUg4GwnN7uLnaaJogEHI0hnIn9lsthvKE83VM7-9FDFUGEv3386kzD32CUXTSu_iTaC2GcJ9XjKlM0dseS/s400/Untitled.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
Can't wait.dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-90064182252728603062012-02-27T20:39:00.003-08:002012-02-27T20:44:32.931-08:00Oscar special!<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi512uY2sXtpzQRt8KB5iv3tRSzFEaulK-aV-H4Y5OWgRSAAFinvER-uDjwGJE3qC8eb979wfneV9dBRztZwl7l7cP4e3M4ARYce8IHHrG929EyLbbjuHfa1bgPQua-iwBrZLj8/s1600/the-artist-holiday-movie-poster.jpg"><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 270px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 400px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5714042288860882658" border="0" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi512uY2sXtpzQRt8KB5iv3tRSzFEaulK-aV-H4Y5OWgRSAAFinvER-uDjwGJE3qC8eb979wfneV9dBRztZwl7l7cP4e3M4ARYce8IHHrG929EyLbbjuHfa1bgPQua-iwBrZLj8/s400/the-artist-holiday-movie-poster.jpg" /></a><br /><br /><div>Have you seen <i>The Artist</i>? Has anyone you know seen it? I can't find anyone who's seen the damned thing.</div><br /><div></div><br /><div>What the hell is so great about a silent movie that looks like every silent movie from the pre-talkies age? </div><br /><div></div><br /><div>Overemphatic gesturing and soundless mouthing of words, all set to music and filmed in black-and-white? In 2012? I'm not all into 3D and crazy special effects, but <em>REALLY</em>? A silent black-and-white movie is the best movie of 2012?</div><br /><div></div><br /><div>I don't get it.</div>dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-76042880223848407902012-02-26T15:22:00.001-08:002012-02-26T15:23:45.275-08:00It's official: He's crazy, and he's rightCheck <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=js3BYcHmBhE&feature=share">this</a> out.dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-35676677099474708432012-02-04T20:08:00.001-08:002012-02-06T15:49:48.006-08:00"Of course" momentsWhen reading the news, I often have "of course" moments, where my suspicions or misgivings or fears are confirmed, the worst turns out to happen or to be true, and I just say, "of course." The latest moments:<br /><br />1. pRick Santorum insults gays YET AGAIN by saying that <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/02/03/418688/santorum-gay-marriage-privilege/">only straight marriages benefit society </a>and are "an intrinsic good." OF COURSE. I knew it had been too long since this asshole spewed his hate. This is, after all, the guy who <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2011/06/06/237112/rick-santorums-top-12-most-offensive-statements/">compared gay marriage to incest</a>. I was so happy when he lost his Senate seat and his <a href="http://impeachmentandotherdreams.blogspot.com/2008/07/letter-from-congressman.html">little family cried and cried</a> and I laughed and laughed.<br /><br />2. Former Chimpy crony <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/02/04/419020/update-komen-announces-continued-involvement-of-ari-fleischer-on-planned-parenthood-strategy/">Ari Fleischer has been helping the Susan G Komen foundation</a> out, and then OF COURSE, SGK cuts off funding to Planned Parenthood. So what looked like a charity to help women ends up bowing to reich-wingers and anti-choice assholes.<br /><br />3. Unemployment is down YET AGAIN, <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/election-2012/gop-rips-january-jobs-report-showing-unemployment-rate-dipped-8-3-article-1.1016546">but repugs keep saying the economy sucks and don't believe what your eyes are seeing</a>! OF COURSE, if Newtie (Nudie?) were in charge, all these stats would be dead on and unimpeachable FACT!dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-44256238001527872242011-12-30T20:04:00.000-08:002011-12-30T20:17:37.708-08:00Court okays Bush's telecom spying<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiKv-Y4iTAYgzCCJrdGx0HH1rCHPj2pH1FzByaqkQxMhjtv8zHX9Po4UXW2LreraU6wEJd1RxdMafHSYkwcg4oJI-70h1key4SYBY0_cC3U3JugWqD9VHvygrvPRRPxa9ecqnp1/s1600/Richard-Nixon-003.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 240px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiKv-Y4iTAYgzCCJrdGx0HH1rCHPj2pH1FzByaqkQxMhjtv8zHX9Po4UXW2LreraU6wEJd1RxdMafHSYkwcg4oJI-70h1key4SYBY0_cC3U3JugWqD9VHvygrvPRRPxa9ecqnp1/s400/Richard-Nixon-003.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5692141683871119346" border="0" /></a><br />So a <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2011/12/30/headlines#1">federal appeals court has upheld</a> immunity for the telecoms -- among them, AT&T and Verizon -- that helped the Bush administration spy on U.S. citizens without a warrant.<br /><br />I guess it's still true <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejvyDn1TPr8">what Nixon said</a>: "When the President does it, that means it's not illegal."<br /><br />Which, I guess, excuses <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123638765474658467.html">Obama's administration</a> too, right? After all, no one seems in any hurry to bring charges of murder for the civilians killed by our drone strikes in Pakistan; just like no one prosecuted Darth Cheney and Chimpy for the Iraqi civilians killed in that debacle.<br /><br />I know I'll sleep better at night knowing that what Nixon (of all people) said is still true today.dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-16972113435702187202011-12-19T18:42:00.000-08:002011-12-19T18:47:00.937-08:00It's a party! It's a lark!<div style="text-align: center;"><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKV-acMQLETqREF_ehU-JJmlaIHQB0LQlDWQH9uksJqF9W4lR8VqxH2tNI92nFByt9WS7tvvRVncuDBLsV1QMpf9s3XuEC-x7SfnvEfhka27Z3StQhkxnggdh4_1cIRElAC6m0/s1600/article-2073491-0BD79447000005DC-476_468x338.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 144px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKV-acMQLETqREF_ehU-JJmlaIHQB0LQlDWQH9uksJqF9W4lR8VqxH2tNI92nFByt9WS7tvvRVncuDBLsV1QMpf9s3XuEC-x7SfnvEfhka27Z3StQhkxnggdh4_1cIRElAC6m0/s200/article-2073491-0BD79447000005DC-476_468x338.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5688036278709158418" border="0" /></a></div><div style="text-align: center; font-style: italic;">Come on along, kids! It's not too<br />late to whore for more publicity!<br /></div><br />Hey, it's "<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2076334/Sarah-Palin-STILL-announce-2012-presidential-bid-just-time-reality-return.html">still not too late for folks to jump in</a>" to the presidential race, according to Mooselini Failin'.<br /><br />It's staggering to see the flippancy with which she regards the office of the presidency of the United States -- as though it's a club or a field trip.dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-69461192348296524662011-10-30T19:14:00.000-07:002011-11-06T11:52:51.412-08:00It's final: I'm writing in KucinichWhether it's ordering <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/10/30/u-s-secretly-flying-drones-out-of-ethiopia-wapo/">drone</a> <a href="http://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/Pakistan/US-drone-strikes-again-6-killed-in-North-Waziristan/Article1-762980.aspx">attacks </a>all over the Middle East and Pakistan and killing indiscriminately, or sending death squads to kill bin Laden, or keeping an attorney general who's possibly been caught <a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/10/06/141124685/holder-takes-heat-over-fast-and-furious-scandal">perjuring himself</a> in front of Congress -- Obama is doing nothing to earn my vote.<br /><br />I realize that he's had to fight an uphill battle to do anything to help the economy or any of us 99%ers, thanks to a determined repug strategy to defeat pretty much every little thing Obama wants to do. They just want to make him look bad and keep the power in their own hands; I understand that.<br /><br />But he's doing plenty all on his own to make me feel like maybe we SHOULD let a repug take over. This whole <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/u-s-troop-withdrawal-motivated-by-iraqi-insistence-not-u-s-choice-20111021">troop withdrawal</a> thing is nothing but smoke and mirrors; he'll pull the fighting men and women out and send in the "advisors" and the "trainers" and every other contractor who wants to earn mad money for risking life and limb and blowing away a few random Iraqis. There's no way the Pentagon lets go of their little toys in the Middle East.<br /><br />God knows the repugs are not going to do any better, as they have no ideas and no consideration for anyone but themselves. Still, it's hard to see how things could get much worse, as I commented on <a href="http://icantbelieveitsnotademocracy.blogs.com/weblog/2011/10/lets-watch-obama-try-to-tightrope-this.html">I Can't Believe It's Not a Democracy</a> after reading GMB's comment about letting the repugs take this shit over for a while and see how they like it.<br /><br />This idea intrigued me; think how little Mittens or (oh gees) Herman Cain (as if) could do to right this ship. It couldn't be any worse than the little that Obama's done, thanks to the repugs blocking his every move, could it?<br /><br />So while I had been thinking that I would have to hold my nose and vote Obama, I'm starting to wonder if maybe I should just write in Kucinich (aka "waste" my vote) and be done with it.dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-54702886250148244642011-10-21T21:26:00.000-07:002011-10-21T22:05:36.256-07:00The ecstacy and the agony<span style="font-style: italic;">With apologies to <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058886/">Irving Stone</a>. But not to Charleton Heston, because he's a dick.</span><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgOosTU4ug96JdPu6o_I7u5FOrfqMdFwPnk8zlUQ_PZOEcFeUUpROy65H6UQfjvkfBTQKU0kDOIGWMM3HHlZzgk9Ltqd3hUzOBLelvxGmNS_10dW7bgqwflhu_KL5_t_ItAk3Vh/s1600/Capitalism.png"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 275px; height: 400px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgOosTU4ug96JdPu6o_I7u5FOrfqMdFwPnk8zlUQ_PZOEcFeUUpROy65H6UQfjvkfBTQKU0kDOIGWMM3HHlZzgk9Ltqd3hUzOBLelvxGmNS_10dW7bgqwflhu_KL5_t_ItAk3Vh/s400/Capitalism.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5666177986609835906" border="0" /></a>Though it's not a recent film, I only just watched Michael Moore's <i>Capitalism: A Love Story.</i> If you haven't seen it, I suggest you do; it's a sharp and insightful piece, and it reminded me of the beginnings of the financial crisis and how perfectly executed was the complete sellout of the American people by our government, leading up to the bailout in the waning days of Chimpy's administration. In light of what's happening now with the Occupy movement, this film is more relevant than ever.<br /><br />Still, there's one section--on the uprising of the people that led to Obama's victory--that stirred memories of one of the happiest nights of my life, as well as brought up a bitter reflux of betrayal. Moore chronicled the almost complete buyout of Congress and the administration by Goldman-Sachs execs (Paulsen, Geithner), senators who got loans from Countrywide (Dodd) before they crashed and burned, the fear-mongering that forced the passing of the TARP bailout -- but a lot of those people stayed in Obama's cabinet. Obama, whose top campaign contributor was Goldman Sachs, ended up being their bitch -- the very thing we elected him NOT to do. I watched the joy on people's faces as they watched Obama's rise, and I remembered the many many many times Obama has furthered the Bush-Cheney administration's many corrupt aims.<br /><br />As I said, Moore didn't spend too much time on Obama; at the time Moore was making the movie (2007-2008, released in 2009), Obama was just starting to gain traction as a man for change, a man who was http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.giffor the people -- in short, a http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifsocialist. I was glad Moore didn't spend much time making Obama into the savior of the people, or he would've had to make a whole other movie just to eat his words.<br /><br />Watch this movie sometime; it'll remind you of just how corrupt most of Washington is and how it got that way.<br /><br />P.S.--the movie also brings up the subject of companies purchasing life insurance policies on their employees and how they profit when those employees die. Check to see if your employer is on<a href="http://deadpeasantinsurance.com/which-employers-bought-policies-on-the-lives-of-employees/"> this list</a>. Gotta tell you that I breathed a sigh of relief that my current employer isn't on the list.dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-74733973348254772742011-09-22T17:34:00.000-07:002011-09-22T18:58:12.686-07:00Must-see TV<blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;">Wilderness: “an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain.” - The 1964 Wilderness Act</span><br /></blockquote>I just watched a program on our WPSU World station (a super-PBS station which rocks) called "Wilderness: The Great Debate." You can watch the entire video <a href="http://www.kued.org/productions/wilderness/">here</a>. A point-counterpoint between everyone from Utah politicians to Robert Redford, the film documents the growing debate between environmentalists who want to preserve American wilderness as wilderness, and those whose main concerns appeared to be jobs, energy, and personal "rights." The emphasis was on the Colorado Plateau of the American West, mainly southern Utah's many wild areas.<br /><br />Here's a nice summary from Utah's KUED, the creator of the film:<br /><blockquote> The core of the debate is reflected in the film’s open. “Is the West going to be reduced to just photos and films to show young people how it used to be, or are there going to be places where they can go and see the way it used to be, like wilderness and like national parks?” Redford asks. On the other hand, Mark Habbeshaw- Kane County Commissioner, says, “This is a war for rural people, for state and local sovereignty, to protect what little sovereignty we have left as a rural people; to protect our traditions, our culture[,] our ability to manage our lives with a diversified economy.” </blockquote>It's an interesting film, and it gave me insight into the teabagger types with their "don't tread on me" flags, whining about how government is trying to take away their land and their rights by daring to attempt to preserve our beautiful natural places from their ATVs, their cattle, their oil rigs, and their development.<br /><br />Of course you know I was yelling at the oil and coal industry types, the ranchers, the "rural people" who are "puttin' protein back into the economy and feedin' people, puttin' out bales o' hay, and takin' care o' God's creation" (also known as overgrazing, corporate-controlled ranching and farming, and CAFOs). But after it was all over, I decided to look at an image:<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0VqdcNu-T9Cs2lYgcF0ZILEiRlED6yIC_3uXgCut15n0NK2AZNdW0Z6OqiDSbLAj5FchovDmlRQZdTlrf0cXo4Eq4Xn-qYkPfjJWphpuMj9zO4zuqQChw1xYFRe48UoJnYDzM/s1600/usa_night+%25282%2529.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 300px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0VqdcNu-T9Cs2lYgcF0ZILEiRlED6yIC_3uXgCut15n0NK2AZNdW0Z6OqiDSbLAj5FchovDmlRQZdTlrf0cXo4Eq4Xn-qYkPfjJWphpuMj9zO4zuqQChw1xYFRe48UoJnYDzM/s400/usa_night+%25282%2529.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5655356380507238082" border="0" /></a>The original image is from <a href="http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_rec.php?id=11795">here.</a> Even the areas discussed in the documentary are largely lit up or surrounded completely by cities. Development has overtaken almost every bit of land in this country. Perhaps the line in the film that hit me the most was the assertion from a Utah politician that politicians from New York and Illinois should "clean up their own states" before they try to tell people in Utah how they can handle their public lands issues.<br /><br />My point is this: As this photograph illustrates, <span style="font-style: italic;">it's too late</span> for people in New York and Illinois to deal with their own states, their own wilderness. It's gone. Gone. So, although it might cost some people their "sovereignty" or their family livelihoods or their economic prosperity, we have to choose the wilderness. We can either preserve our wilderness as it is, with no development and extremely limited access, or we can have an entire country that looks like this:<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIszZqpu_4cAK4daQS0OEQJS4OuE0psXpIpiq0h4hL8PX_Uwn74v8GBRov78zrxWX40Ny_GZsYzLao3ijinB4ahoa5V_htNT_5NsyzWOd2aSekOFfTN_HDUHVpOWCVTHElz402/s1600/Europe+lights.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 254px; height: 246px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIszZqpu_4cAK4daQS0OEQJS4OuE0psXpIpiq0h4hL8PX_Uwn74v8GBRov78zrxWX40Ny_GZsYzLao3ijinB4ahoa5V_htNT_5NsyzWOd2aSekOFfTN_HDUHVpOWCVTHElz402/s400/Europe+lights.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5655358648152886818" border="0" /></a>This is the continent of Europe lit up at night. Teabaggers and pro-Amurka types are constantly railing against Europe over issues like public healthcare and other such "socialist" policies. Remember how repugs starting talking about "freedom fries" when the French pissed kick-ass Amurkans off by actually speaking against the first Iraq war?<br /><br />Yes, Europe is filled with socialist pansies who basically know nothing. Yet, if we allow development wherever it is economically expedient, profitable, and desired by whoever decides such questions, we will end up looking like a version of Europe.<br /><br />Of course, it would only be "a version," a pale version at that. Where Europe has the remains of civilization's beginnings -- Greek temples, Roman colliseums, and other architectural wonders -- our development in America doesn't look anything like that.<br /><br />No, our development looks like this:<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhW8JL31JR_06xlMeEMG1u0CqYwbWBq_uIDNX53REVuNpVD4GtXw-q_f6Ea5uM00Q0q7oO1zfc7H_7xqBA1_Vzl7MLoVyvHqz7J64gyz8RAo0HIsB28Tu5hcWoyHHaPWHjQFfyN/s1600/las-vegas-skyline-727067.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 280px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhW8JL31JR_06xlMeEMG1u0CqYwbWBq_uIDNX53REVuNpVD4GtXw-q_f6Ea5uM00Q0q7oO1zfc7H_7xqBA1_Vzl7MLoVyvHqz7J64gyz8RAo0HIsB28Tu5hcWoyHHaPWHjQFfyN/s400/las-vegas-skyline-727067.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5655363152888055250" border="0" /></a><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoGW4u2_rp89W0ObGXAad5XfOvg1RMY1wtcGHc95hJwF-JmKEXb2GOGKduum8NeFNUTYoLbo_fA-XszQfdomADunBzXMuwS3NKuE0jevNae-zvZwjpm562bkptrE4qL-yeq93f/s1600/chaco360.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 360px; height: 240px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoGW4u2_rp89W0ObGXAad5XfOvg1RMY1wtcGHc95hJwF-JmKEXb2GOGKduum8NeFNUTYoLbo_fA-XszQfdomADunBzXMuwS3NKuE0jevNae-zvZwjpm562bkptrE4qL-yeq93f/s400/chaco360.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5655363149802034210" border="0" /></a><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhu8EEcPfiV9YSnsKd9NLjM1tIC3z5iLrov2mNcxagQBNQsCw2aJ4WGRUTTb8MoYwyMb8i9MvtUYsig7XU_ho78JypqTz-PcxuU5eq-WDJKE-7IRYPXUgpUsM8gDzTWaPsd_M8L/s1600/sprawl.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 332px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhu8EEcPfiV9YSnsKd9NLjM1tIC3z5iLrov2mNcxagQBNQsCw2aJ4WGRUTTb8MoYwyMb8i9MvtUYsig7XU_ho78JypqTz-PcxuU5eq-WDJKE-7IRYPXUgpUsM8gDzTWaPsd_M8L/s400/sprawl.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5655363157501560930" border="0" /></a>Europe's wilderness is pretty much gone, the victim of thousands of years of development. America's development began only a few hundred years ago, yet we hurry to plaster our sprawl and our footprint all over everything.<br /><br />And the American West? The sweeping vistas of Utah, Montana, the Badlands? Forget it! Let's just fence it off and put cows on it, let ATV riders hotdog all over it, criss-cross it with networks of roads, put oil derricks and shale-oil fracking operations all over it, and focus on what the land can yield financially instead of what it gives to our souls and our imaginations.<br /><blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;">"...what are you going to have left to develop if you don't preserve something, and also what are you going to preserve for the dignity and the stature of your country in terms of its heritage?” --Robert Redford</span><br /></blockquote>dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-29444513839874439862011-09-05T17:40:00.001-07:002011-09-05T17:56:57.892-07:00Today's random thoughtsThese days, my random thoughts are all questions. I'm pretty much out of answers anymore.
<br />
<br />1. I recently received an Obama 2012 bumpersticker and plea for more money in the mail. I stared at the sticker for some time; then I threw it away. I've been trying to decide what I'm going to do on Election Day 2012; I'm pretty much decided I'm writing in a vote for <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/09/dennis-kucinich-calls-for-ohio-union-busting-bill-to-be-crushed/">Kucinich</a>.
<br />
<br />Regarding my faded old "Hope" sticker from the 2008 election: My car and I were rear-ended on June 30, and the bumper was destroyed. The resulting repairs solved my problem of how I was going to get rid of the old sticker; it's gone.
<br />
<br />Whom will you vote for in 2012?
<br />
<br />2. The unemployment rate at the height of the Great Depression was 24.9% in 1933. Our unemployment rate today is 9.1%. What does this mean? I'm really not sure. Part of me wants to say, "why do the media insist on calling this time the worst since the Great Depression? I mean, unemployment's only 9%." I remember when I was in California, I took a photo of a headline stating that the state's unemployment had reached 12%.
<br />
<br />Still, despite the bleak jobs outlook (NPR does a story on the jobless almost every day), my situation is pretty good. The people I know who want work have work.
<br />
<br />What's the situation where you are?
<br />
<br />3. I have been really weepy and down lately, and I can't get out of it. Part of it is the rainy weather and the knowledge that our climate is changing and there's no telling how many formerly snowy days will, in the future, be rainy days. A bigger part is the fact that we're coming on the 10th anniversary of 9/11. I read <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44374693/ns/technology_and_science-science/?GT1=43001">a story earlier today that said, "most people who were glued to the news for days in 2001 now think only rarely about that horrifying day</a>." Is that really true? Is it weird that I think about it every time I see an American flag? Every time I see a photo of Chimpy Bush or Darth Cheney? Every time I hear mention of the economy? Just today, I was listening to a story about unemployed people trying to find work and how the economy just hasn't been producing enough jobs since the crash of 2008 -- and I found myself muttering, "the economy hasn't been producing enough jobs since 9/11." But is that even true?
<br />
<br />Are you feeling optimistic or pessimistic as we approach the anniversary of 9/11?
<br />
<br /><em>Your comments are appreciated.</em>
<br />dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-11096730209335565252011-09-01T19:14:00.001-07:002011-09-01T21:16:27.204-07:00True, False, or just ridiculous?I was just reading an amazing post on DCap's blog about how <a href="http://distributorcapny.blogspot.com/2011/08/here-comes-that-rainy-day-feeling-again.html">some idiots from a right-wing "think" tank want to abolish the National Weather Service</a>.
<br />
<br />Why, you ask?
<br />
<br />Because it would be oh-so-much better to PRIVATIZE it! Because OF COURSE everything the government does is wasteful, bloated, and completely leading America into hell!
<br />
<br />As is his custom and his skill, DCap totally lays waste to their "arguments" (I use the term loosely), but as I was reading the post, I remembered something else I heard today on NPR about how Cantor and the other moron repugs in Congress are on a mission to reduce "job-destroying regulations" to help create jobs in America.
<br />
<br />My train of thought then stopped at this station:
<br />DOES ANYONE STILL BELIEVE THAT CORE REPUBLICAN TENETS ARE TRUE?
<br />
<br />A few examples of typical republican thinking:
<br />1. Privatization is the answer to cutting government waste, as business will do things better and cheaper.
<br />
<br />2. Regulations on business mean loss of jobs. This goes for ANY kind of regulation, whether related to the environment, business practices, or whatever.
<br />
<br />3. Abortion and any kind of family planning are wrong; any organizations that promote anything but abstinence should be de-funded.
<br />
<br />4. The death penalty is the best way to deal with certain criminals.
<br />
<br />5. Welfare, Social Security, Medicare, unemployment benefits -- all the government programs that are referred to as the "social safety net" are actually "entitlements," and entitlements are bad and should be cut and/or stopped.
<br />
<br />These are just a few off the top of my head. Repugs have been parroting these things as Absolute Truth my entire adult life. From Ronald Reagan's Cadillac-driving welfare mothers to the proposed de-funding of Planned Parenthood, from claiming every life is precious so we shouldn't use birth control or abortion but criminals should die for their crimes, from the gutting of the social safety net to the rise of mercenaries like Blackwater and dirty-drinking-water-providers like Halliburton, the republicans have hit people over the head with this stuff for so long that many people actually believe it's true, proven fact.
<br />
<br />But is it?
<br />
<br />Let's look at these one at a time.
<br />
<br />1. Does privatizing something actually cut costs or increase them? DCap's argument about the National Weather Service is proof positive that privatization would be MORE expensive than the current government-run program. If the NWS gets a billion bucks per year in funding, as the conservative think tank claims, that's ALL the weather information we see EVERYWHERE in the media coming to us for only $3.23 per every man, woman, and child in the US. Then, DCap argues, imagine how much it would cost if some corporate weather service were to charge us for this information; somehow, I don't think we'd be paying only three-and-a-quarter for our weather info, do you?
<br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiO1txYCbwN95CpEsEV_fmy8LFelhoPYkbvCZAeAU9Dw1cD0OyTHZctWLqUr5uyZw9zGyEKRfN-o8cmolPyG2C8DrceIa5Cu0kIbw2QNfUcW88gTQBveKB8J3e8G8e5Cgrkr2b-/s1600/halliburton.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 300px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiO1txYCbwN95CpEsEV_fmy8LFelhoPYkbvCZAeAU9Dw1cD0OyTHZctWLqUr5uyZw9zGyEKRfN-o8cmolPyG2C8DrceIa5Cu0kIbw2QNfUcW88gTQBveKB8J3e8G8e5Cgrkr2b-/s400/halliburton.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5647604844249716674" border="0" /></a>Let's look at the financial fiasco that was the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the trillions that were/are being spent to hire such corporations as Blackwater, Halliburton, and more to provide everything from food and water to security. A congressional committee found that between $30 and $60 BILLION were lost to fraud, waste, and abuse.
<br />
<br />Does ANYONE, besides republicans and their teabagger cousins, really think that American corporations -- the same ones that basically pay little or no taxes yet are granted personhood in the eyes of the law just like you or me -- can do ANYTHING without wasting, pissing away, or just plain stealing taxpayer money? I pay taxes to keep my government running, to keep it doing the things I expect government to do. I DON'T pay taxes so my government can give my money to profit-over-people, corner-cutting, mercenary assholes.
<br />
<br />When will someone in power challenge this ridiculous assertion, this utter myth that privatization is good? Or will republicans simply continue to be allowed to spew this fallacy and slash regulations to continue helping their corporate benefactors increase their profits at the expense of the environment, ethics, and Americans?
<br />
<br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggyS4ANF-Jq4t155Im5-KxT__xFMZhjgBNDpQvmsfnr3TL20RrwgjdZ0Cpr4QHGwXNHgRhblUoNePLNnHPC-x5qpXtgotqigT7UKPF_oDhoD0lkQRpln-27sxT2TXs3MdJ8EpU/s1600/boner.png"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 220px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggyS4ANF-Jq4t155Im5-KxT__xFMZhjgBNDpQvmsfnr3TL20RrwgjdZ0Cpr4QHGwXNHgRhblUoNePLNnHPC-x5qpXtgotqigT7UKPF_oDhoD0lkQRpln-27sxT2TXs3MdJ8EpU/s400/boner.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5647603923160880226" border="0" /></a>2. Do regulations really "strangle" businesses so that they can't hire more people? I heard <a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/09/01/140115604/in-jobs-debate-gop-targets-regulatory-burdens">a story on NPR this afternoon</a> that pretty much made it plain that this is bullshit:<blockquote>Yet in a <a href="http://www.nabe.com/publib/pol/11/08/nabepolicy1108.pdf" target="_blank">survey last month of 250 economists</a> by the National Association for Business Economics, 4 out of 5 agreed that the current regulatory environment for American businesses was, in fact, good. In a July survey done by the <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303661904576452181063763332.html" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a></em> in July, two-thirds of economists said the lack of jobs is due mainly to a lack of sales.</blockquote>And the Wall Street Journal is not exactly a liberal rag, so they can't argue that I got this info from "the liberal media!" of NPR. And if you think about it, regulations that must be complied with can mean more jobs -- as long as more businesses keep those jobs in AMERICA instead of hiring shit-cheap labor from China, Bangladesh, and other places to up their profit margins while screwing American workers. Environmental protection, as the NPR piece mentions, demands equipment to filter emissions, wastewater, etc. -- someone has to make that equipment. Why not let Americans make the stuff?
<br />
<br />Republicans also whine about how any other energy sources besides oil and coal are job-killers. This is patently absurd; think of how many American businesses could make a profit by installing geothermal heating systems, by making and installing solar panels, or by developing other alternative energy sources? American ingenuity could actually help us get off foreign oil, instead of dumping more and more money into tar sands and pipelines and fucking the environment in the process.
<br />
<br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhiku7tTlqayrhcUe5i7tJymT1CPyqEpaEX36GGkiPtcu5Ve8oZuV2Cq3N3VAriilHUdpunfnBmQ3MdmFrncl41tdY3hWUYjnAx1z4dKsqSnPpWF8SJd6IdwwhiOFg0FqB5R3DX/s1600/boner+crying.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 340px; height: 259px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhiku7tTlqayrhcUe5i7tJymT1CPyqEpaEX36GGkiPtcu5Ve8oZuV2Cq3N3VAriilHUdpunfnBmQ3MdmFrncl41tdY3hWUYjnAx1z4dKsqSnPpWF8SJd6IdwwhiOFg0FqB5R3DX/s400/boner+crying.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5647605597432672402" border="0" /></a>3. Let's deal with the abortion/family planning question with one logical assertion in which I have always believed:<span style="font-style: italic;"> you cannot legislate morality. </span>Questions about whether a fetus is a person, whether wearing a condom is killing a potential life, or whether Planned Parenthood is the devil can never truly be resolved; they are matters of opinion based on a person's individual beliefs. I myself belief a fetus is not a person; it's not a person until it's born. Still, I don't know whether I could go through with an abortion; it's not ever going to be an issue (unless AB is hiding something I don't know about in our bed!), so I don't <span style="font-style: italic;">have</span> to know. I only know that it's MY body, and I would decide. No one, including the government or my parents or anyone else, can or should decide that for me or anyone.
<br />
<br />Murder, on the other hand, is a crime because it's one living person ending the life of another living person. That one is NOT a question of morality; it's a tearing of the social fabric, ripping a person from all his worldly connections and thus harming not only him but the society in which he lives.
<br />
<br />Which leads us to...
<br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXkEzf5JpdjF85BR5ZXm4pLO78xJ5tZz0wHwc_U6HJYr62-CEGJ75HMlqgrZd0zlTRQprKJD45TX6umOMaBUUScATvOmJ_tHco_3fhZmLuiXc_-SBQ798mCFIBB9SEbb3cT4za/s1600/puke.png"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 240px; height: 178px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXkEzf5JpdjF85BR5ZXm4pLO78xJ5tZz0wHwc_U6HJYr62-CEGJ75HMlqgrZd0zlTRQprKJD45TX6umOMaBUUScATvOmJ_tHco_3fhZmLuiXc_-SBQ798mCFIBB9SEbb3cT4za/s400/puke.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5647607698077438546" border="0" /></a>4. The death penalty is the best way to deal with criminals. Because I believe that no one has the right to kill another living person, it makes equal sense that the government should not have the right to kill anyone. The death penalty is a direct contradiction of republicans' belief that every life is precious, their usual supportive statement for their anti-family planning and anti-abortion stance. Because if every life is precious, then even the lives of murderers and drug dealers and whoever else they want to kill are precious, no? They can't have it both ways. I may not like murderers or drug dealers, and I may think I'd want to kill one with my bare hands if one ever hurt anyone I care about, but it's not up to me to kill anyone. And again -- I don't pay taxes so my government can effing kill people. (And by the way, that goes for wars too.)
<br />
<br />
<br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjBGy1DC1wgC1xUETBCej1L3Ir_Jr461EceIzz9wPHw5qW2hqD0286U_kHhYeCaAPtOXN_TNd44FAOUfkn35QR5nWKR06rL67PkvScrt1J31UYX6boktUXPm6e_PjQfwIEgw5uR/s1600/cantor_jobs.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 287px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjBGy1DC1wgC1xUETBCej1L3Ir_Jr461EceIzz9wPHw5qW2hqD0286U_kHhYeCaAPtOXN_TNd44FAOUfkn35QR5nWKR06rL67PkvScrt1J31UYX6boktUXPm6e_PjQfwIEgw5uR/s400/cantor_jobs.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5647611182207792546" border="0" /></a>5. Entitlements are bad! Just think about this: if our government didn't spend money on wars, what would our deficit look like? Conservative estimates of the costs of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars put the tab at over a trillion dollars; some estimates top three trillion dollars. Would we be arguing over a few billion in "entitlements" that keep children fed, the unemployed fed and housed, and our aging population fed and housed and cared for if our national debt weren't over $14.6 trillion dollars? And if these wars, which President Obama decided to stop hiding the costs of and thus gets blamed for the huge debt (instead of just hiding it like Bush/Cheney did), hadn't increased our debt a huge amount in a short period of time, would we even be letting these republicans spew their tripe about cutting the debt by hurting the poorest and neediest among us?
<br />
<br />Further, think about this: what would happen if your parents or mine suddenly had their social security benefits and their Medicare benefits cut by half? Or even a third? Would they be able to pay their bills? Put food on their tables? They paid their whole lives into the system, and now repubs think these "entitlements" are just typical government waste. I suppose republicans never look at the fact that THEY are living ENTIRELY off the government -- except, of course, for those checks they get from the oil companies and other big business to do their bidding.
<br />
<br />When will the media simply say, "ENOUGH!" and stop airing republican lies?
<br />dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-5531209135161106902011-08-11T18:31:00.000-07:002011-08-11T18:58:08.309-07:00Today's daily FRIGHTYesterday's daily fright occurred when I opened my mailbox and saw that damned <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/08/newsweeks-michele-bachman_n_920860.html">Michele Bachman cover</a>. Holy shit.
<br />
<br />Today's daily fright: Rick Perry is <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/republicans/8696921/Rick-Perry-to-run-for-US-president.html">runnin' fer prezdint</a>.
<br />
<br />Texas is in the worst shape it's ever been in, even worse than the Bush years (but only because of Bush's presidency and the financial collapse it caused to our economy). Yet this bozo thinks he can be -- and should be -- president of these United States.
<br />
<br />He's already got the Texas spin machines working for him. Check out this slobber-soaked quote from an SMU (that's in Dallas) professor: "'I think Perry will shoot to the top of the polls right away, and be neck and neck with Romney,' said Cal Jillson, a political scientist at Southern Methodist University in Texas" (quoted in the Telegraph article). All his little minions are busy shaking the same money trees Bush used, I'm sure.
<br />
<br />And those trees were loaded.
<br />
<br />(P.S. -- I googled this Jillson fellow; read his over-the-top bio <a href="http://smu.edu/smunews/americandream/biography.asp">here</a>. Despite the fact that the guy "is currently at work on a book titled <i>Lone Star Tarnished</i> on the shortcomings of Texas public policy," he makes a supremely stupid comment like this, knowing that perception is reality in the lame-stream media and this kind of blurbomatic crap just gets echoed around the Faux Nooz echo chamber of lies.)
<br />
<br />We'll see whether Governor Goodhair (God I miss <a href="http://blog.chron.com/txpotomac/2011/07/perry-watch-the-governors-looks-not-his-views-are-a-mane-concern-of-national-press/">Molly Ivins</a>) even gets out of the box. The sad part is that, if that article I just linked to is any indication, we're going to have to endure hairdo comparisons between Romney and Perry and the rest for the next year. That alone will raise his profile among the morons who thought his<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/06/us/politics/06perry.html"> little prayer and fasting rally for rain</a> in Texas was a good idea.
<br />
<br />Ask the poor and the teachers and the prison inmates, etc., in Texas how great things are under Perry and see what they tell you.
<br />dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18773945.post-50975273293045462062011-08-03T18:18:00.000-07:002011-08-03T19:21:51.708-07:00I wonder...<span style="font-style:italic;">These thoughts occurred to me while listening to <a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/08/03/138922932/inside-the-tea-partys-rising-influence">Fresh Air tonight</a>, in which Terri Gross interviewed journalist Robert Draper about the influence of the recent influx of tea party-controlled reps in the House. I don't know much about Draper's personal leanings, but he certainly thinks these idiots hold a lot of power--which only feeds into the perception that they do. And because perception is more important than reality in Washington, I just got completely pissed off at Terri Gross for letting this guy talk about tea party morons and republicans for a whole fucking hour.</span><br /><br />I wonder what it's like to be a tea partier in the House of Representatives, living in my office so I won't have an actual residence in D.C. After all, I sure wouldn't want to live in the real world, paying rent, buying groceries, cooking for myself and my family, and having deal with all that unimportant "real life" crap. I sure wouldn't want my constituents to think I sold out by having an apartment in the Sodom-and-Gomorrah that is Washington D.C.!<br /><br />Think of it: sleeping on a cot or a couch in my office (all of which is paid for by our tax dollars), working out and showering and such in the taxpayer-funded gym at the (corporate-funded?) Capitol, and devoting every waking hour to politicking and voting and being whipped around by the Majority Whip!<br /><br />One of the coolest parts of being in the House would, of course, be the fact that I wouldn't really have to do anything <span style="font-style:italic;">but</span> these things. I wouldn't have to worry about healthcare (it's provided for free!), or retirement (yeah, that's provided too!), or shopping for groceries (I'd eat in the Capitol cafeteria!) or <span style="font-style:italic;">anything</span> -- all I'd have to do is make sure I voted like Eric Cantor wants me to, worshiped Boner's nuclear-induced tan, and walked the razor-thin line between voting against any and all tax hikes for the rich and pretending I give a shit about what taxes are paid by middle-class Americans -- because "no more taxes!" means "no more taxes," man!<br /><br />And hey--<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/14/AR2011021406723.html">I can always pose for photo ops in my skivvies and claim I work 20 hours a day, pay for my own stationery, and try to opt out of my guaranteed-no-opting-out-of-it healthcare plan</a>! See, America! I'll never sell out!<br /><br />And when the <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/house-gop-leaks-story-of-debt-ceiling-motivational-tool-ben-afflecks-the-town/">whip-guy plays us a video about how bad-ass</a> we're gonna be and how people are gonna get hurt! to get us all pumped up and prepped to vote NO on anything the President or those damned democrats propose, I'll truly believe I'm a bad ass. And if any of you non-patriots think I've completely lost touch with reality, then you obviously aren't a christian or a patriot.<br /><br />So I'll watch a movie, snap my fellow tea partiers on the ass with my towel in the gym, REFUSE to raise taxes on the rich or even close the millions of loopholes that allow billionaires and corporations to pay practically nothing in taxes. Why take that money when we can just cut spending on the poor, the aged, and the young instead? Easy peasy! "We're gonna hurt some people!"<br /><br />In the past I've wondered how and "liberal" became a dirty word. Now, the big dirty word is "entitlements." All the republicans and tea partiers talk about is "entitlements" and how we have to cut them, by golly, or else!<br /><br />Of course, they're not talking about the REAL entitlements -- like the unlimited funding for anything that can be remotely considered "defense spending." Whether it's trying to make sharks into spies or teach soldiers to communicate telepathically, or pouring trillions into boondoggles like the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, these guaranteed trillions are somehow NOT ENTITLEMENTS! I guess those people deserve those trillions, right? No, the bad entitlements we absolutely have to cut is stuff like medicare, social security, and healthcare -- because the people getting this money are REALLY bleeding us dry! THAT'S the true problem!<br /><br />Yup, being a tea partier -- representing a fraction of the population that's too stupid to realize they're voting against their own self interests (wait until THEY retire or need healthcare) -- would pretty much rock. I'd eat, sleep, and breathe politics, because that's what I was elected to do, right? It's all about winning these political battles, not living in the real world.<br /><br />But OF COURSE I would stay strong in the knowledge that I'm representing the little guy while I'm making sure the rich pay no more taxes! Making sure I cut the government spending that actually HELPS most Americans! Completely ignoring the true sources of government waste (defense spending, wars, lifetime healthcare and benefits for all members of Congress)!<br /><br />P.S. -- Wanna get a headache? Check <a href="http://www.usdebtclock.org/">this</a> out.dguzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.com2